Key differences at a glance - pricing, features, and ease of use.
| Factor | Astuto | DeepCost |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Contact Sales Enterprise-only pricing | From $99/month Transparent pricing |
| Multi-Cloud Support | AWS-focused Limited GCP/Azure | Full Support AWS, GCP, Azure |
| Kubernetes Optimization | Limited Basic support | Excellent Native K8s optimization |
| AI/ML Cost Optimization | None Not supported | Full Support OpenAI, Anthropic, etc. |
| Setup Time | 1-2 weeks Manual configuration | 5 minutes Automated setup |
Credit where credit is due - Astuto's genuine strengths and advantages.
Astuto has strong capabilities in automated reserved instance recommendations and purchasing workflows for AWS environments.
Solid spot instance management with automated provisioning and cost-saving strategies for stateless workloads.
Deep focus on AWS-specific cost optimization strategies including savings plans and commitment-based discounts.
Provides automated recommendations for right-sizing and instance type optimization within AWS ecosystems.
Key advantages that make DeepCost a stronger choice for most use cases.
Unlike Astuto, DeepCost optimizes AI service costs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Claude) which often represent 30-50% of modern cloud bills.
Native support for AWS, GCP, and Azure vs Astuto's AWS-focused approach with limited multi-cloud capabilities.
Advanced Kubernetes cost optimization with AI-enhanced recommendations, pod right-sizing, and namespace-level insights.
Clear, public pricing starting at $99/month vs Astuto's enterprise-only contact sales model.
Complete cost management platform with budgets, allocation, showback, and financial workflows beyond basic RI optimization.
Honest recommendations based on your specific needs and constraints.
If you only need AWS reserved instance optimization and have no Kubernetes or AI workloads, Astuto's focus might be sufficient.
DeepCost provides equal optimization across AWS, GCP, and Azure, while Astuto is primarily AWS-focused.
DeepCost is the only platform that optimizes both traditional infrastructure AND AI service costs in one solution.
DeepCost provides native Kubernetes optimization with pod-level insights, while Astuto has limited K8s support.
When you need predictable, transparent pricing without enterprise sales cycles.
When you need full cost management workflows, budgeting, and allocation - not just RI optimization.
Real stories from teams who migrated from Astuto to DeepCost.
"Astuto was limited to AWS reserved instances. DeepCost saves us significantly more by optimizing our entire multi-cloud stack AND our AI costs."
"Astuto's pricing was opaque and they couldn't help with our Kubernetes workloads. DeepCost gives us everything we need at a price we can predict."
Honest answers to common questions about both platforms.
Astuto has strong AWS reserved instance capabilities. However, DeepCost provides comparable RI optimization while also covering GCP, Azure, Kubernetes, and AI/ML costs that Astuto doesn't address.
Astuto requires enterprise contracts with undisclosed pricing. DeepCost offers transparent pricing starting at $99/month. For most teams, DeepCost delivers better value through broader coverage (multi-cloud + AI/ML) at predictable costs.
Yes. You can run both platforms in parallel to compare results before migrating. Most customers transition over 1-2 weeks with zero disruption to existing workloads.
No. Astuto has limited Kubernetes support, while DeepCost provides comprehensive Kubernetes-native optimization with pod-level insights, namespace allocation, and AI-enhanced recommendations.
DeepCost provides full, native support for AWS, GCP, and Azure with equal optimization quality. Astuto is primarily AWS-focused with limited multi-cloud capabilities.
Astuto has not announced AI/ML cost optimization features. DeepCost already provides comprehensive AI service optimization for OpenAI, Anthropic, Claude, and other providers.